You are hereBlogs / francis's blog / Possible date fields for new entries

Possible date fields for new entries


By francis - Posted on 26 January 2009

Following are some proposed date fields for digital material.  How many (or what others) are used depends largely on who the entries are for--who will use it and for what purpose, etc.  
 
Comments welcome.
 
Francis
 
Reference No.
Title
Date of Creation
            Start
            End
Custodial History
Scope and Content
Notes
Physical Condition
Format
            Original
            Present
Length
Creator(s)
Ownership
Copyright
Subjects
Location
Part of Collection

Great list Francis. Covers many important angles of our work. I think we need to start working with actual archives, and pilot the structure. This will let us know what is missing or excessive for a digital poetry archive. A categorical search function will be needed, one that relates to different kinds of digital poetry and the discussions related to them. I've posed some of these questions regarding "genre" in my recent blog about defining digital poetry. Francis and I are meeting with Jeannette Kopac, program director of the Center for Digital Media in Vancouver, who was the CBC archivist for many years, to get some ideas and inspirations about putting the archives together, funding them, and the nitty gritty of necessary catalogue information. My hope is that we'll have an initial action plan and can start to act on it in about 5-6 weeks. If anyone has further suggestions as regards this list, please put them forward in the next 2-3 weeks so we have time to review and consider them. Thank you.

I'm proposing that we use the partly built-in CCK module to manage content types. This gets pretty technical, so I'll just start the dialogue without getting into too much detail, and say that we shouldn't experiment much, but rather employ some careful planning. Here's a useful and only semi-nerdly video tutorial that demonstrates the Drupal definitions of "Story" "Page" "Node" "Module" and explains the overview of defining content types: http://drupal.org/node/70151 (I'll post more learning resources soon, probably make a story and discussion for this purpose)

K and I were in agreement that we should encourage either releasing items into the public domain or the use of creative commons. I think we should incorporate CC licensing as a balanced approach, as it has a broad range of options. The copyright fields can have date as well as toggle-selection of many license categories. Flickr.com is a good example. We would have to elaborate and clarify on a page or two about this policy and approach and link to creativecommons.org appropriate pages. Drupal may have some nice integration somewhere, I'll look into technical options.f (damn, I'm going to have to make the comments field be plain text as well, this is ugly)

Thanks Francis! This sent me looking for a copy of the comprehensive (membership-library-resources-distro-contacts) database that I did for Video In/Out back in the '90s, but it's archived on a disc somewhere (how apropos!). It had similar fields with some useful details and relations. I'll keep looking, now that my curiosity's piqued, it should be useful, an invented wheel.

Search

DPAC update

Add your name to our email list to receive periodic updates on DPAC.

Syndicate content

RSS feed

Syndicate content